🌐 Unite the World
← Explore the story library

Full article

Scylla cuts Nisus’s fatal lock

Scylla removes the distinctive hair on which her father Nisus’s safety depends during Minos’s siege.

Archaic Greek poetry; later Greek mythography or Roman poetry · 2026-10-31

Traditions: Archaic Greek poetry; later Greek mythography or Roman poetry Motif: A daughter betrays a city by cutting a protective lock Connection verdict: Related named retelling with differing moral staging Article status: Expanded Date: 2026-10-31

Summary

Scylla removes the distinctive hair on which her father Nisus’s safety depends during Minos’s siege.

Read the two scenes

In Apollodorus, a compact report of siege and oracle makes the lock a condition of political survival; Scylla’s act immediately becomes treason. Ovid pauses over her view from the walls and her attraction to the enemy king, letting readers see how she rationalizes betrayal. Minos does not reward the act done for him. The lock is a precise narrative mechanism, but Ovid’s poem invests it with a fuller conflict between desire and civic loyalty.

What connects—and what does not

Apollodorus ends brutally with Minos tying and drowning Scylla; Ovid develops her desire and Minos’s moral rejection before metamorphosis.

The same names and fatal lock indicate a shared myth, while the accounts differ in culpability, punishment, and emotional access.

Why read them side by side?

A tiny bodily sign can bear a city’s fate while different retellings judge the betrayer in distinct ways.

Sources and reading notes

  • Apollodorus, Library 3.15.8 — Nisus’s purple hair and Scylla’s bargain with Minos Theoi Classical Texts Library English translation; inspect the named locus and its notes. Later Greek mythographic compilation, conventionally dated to the early Roman imperial period.
  • Ovid, Metamorphoses 8.1–151 — Scylla’s desire, haircut, Minos’s rejection Theoi Classical Texts Library English translation; inspect the named locus and its notes. Latin Roman poetry from the early first century CE.

Research limit

A named parallel can establish literary reuse or related tradition; a general resemblance alone cannot prove borrowing. Linked editions and translations vary. Where a source is identified as secondary orientation, the comparison does not claim direct close reading of that tradition’s primary text.